Showing posts with label canon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canon. Show all posts

Canon EOS M Review

on Sunday, November 23, 2014
This is an in-depth review of the Canon EOS M camera that came out on July 23, 2012, the first mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera from Canon. Along with the EOS M, Canon also announced the first two lenses for the new “EF-M” mount: Canon EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM. Among major camera manufacturers, Canon was the last to enter the mirrorless market. Aside from Panasonic and Olympus sharing the same Micro Four Thirds sensor and Nikon going with a smaller “CX” sensor, all other manufacturers chose large APS-C sized sensors (Samsung, Sony, Fuji and Pentax), each with its own proprietary lens mount. With the introduction of the EOS M system, Canon has officially joined the APS-C club. Instead of developing a new sensor format, Canon chose to reuse the same 18 MP sensor from the EOS Rebel 650D / T4i DSLR camera. Canon also released an EF-M to EF / EF-S adapter for mounting existing and future DSLR lenses on the EOS M, with full compatibility with all lens functions such as autofocus and image stabilization. In this review, I will go over the features and capabilities of the camera and compare it to other mirrorless options, including Nikon 1, Sony NEX series and Olympus OM-D E-M5.

With its arch-rival Nikon debuting the Nikon 1 CX mount with a smaller 2.7x crop factor sensor a year earlier, Canon made sure that the 1.6x crop factor APS-C sensor was in the headlines of its announcements, with “The Quality of a Canon DSLR” title being a major part of the initial marketing effort. I spent over two months with the Canon EOS M while testing other mirrorless cameras for my “Battle of the Mirrorless” series, so I will be doing a lot of comparisons of the EOS M to other cameras in this review, along with discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the camera. Let’s take a look at the Canon EOS M in detail.

1) Canon EOS M Specifications

Main Features:
  1. 18 MP CMOS image sensor, 4.3 µm pixel pitch
  2. ISO 100-12800 native, expandable to 25600 in H mode)
  3. Hybrid CMOS AF (phase-detection AF/contrast-detection AF)
  4. 31 AF points
  5. 3″ Touchscreen LCD with 1040K dots
  6. Full 1080p HD movie shooting 30p/24p/25p
  7. Face Detection + Object Tracking AF
  8. 4 Standard “Creative Zone” Exposure Modes (Program, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority and Manual) and 8 additional presets
  9. Battery life for up to 230 shots
  10. Vertical-travel, mechanical, focal-plane shutter with all speeds electronically-controlled (1/4000 max)
  11. Compatible with Canon EF and EF-S lenses via an optional EF-EOS M mount adapter
  12. Standard size flash hot shoe
  13. Up to 4.3 fps continuous shooting

Canon PowerShot SX700 Review

on Wednesday, November 12, 2014

For

Point and shoot ease or full manual control, close-up macro mode, good image stabilisation, decent image quality

Against

Limited autofocus options, no raw capture, 30x zoom limitations at longer extension, no touchscreen, more basic than Panasonic TZ60

As the compact camera market continues to shrink, the outlay of new product seems to be surfing a common theme: zoom is increasing in a war waged with fixed-lens smartphone cameras. The Canon PowerShot SX700 HS - the update to the earlier SX280 HS model - and its jump from a 20x to 30x optical zoom epitomises this trend; the significant bump in spec warranting the jump in model number.
Despite packing more in the lens department, the SX700 avoids considerable waist-line expansion - it's only a little chunkier than its predecessor - and is competitive against the likes of the Panasonic Lumix TZ60 and Sony Cyber-shot HX60.
But is the more considerable zoom lens the right area to focus on? Indeed, does this update make for a less adept camera rather than a more advanced one than before, and does Canon's straightforward approach lack the polish of its nearest competitors? We've been shooting with the Canon SX700 in both sunny Portugal and the rainy UK to see whether it's the king of the travel zoom compacts.

Design

The SX700 HS features a 25-750mm equivalent optical zoom lens, which means a 50 per cent greater reach than the earlier SX280 model. That doesn't come at the expense of a giant body size, as the 34.8mm thickness attests. Only when extending the lens fully does the camera take on a more considerable form on account of the protruding lens, but when switched off it's a pocketable purchase.

In terms of layout and design the SX700 treads a similar path to the SX280 HS, albeit with the inclusion of a protruding front grip to aid a comfortable hold. It sits neatly in the hand, so no complaints on that front.
To the back there's a mode dial positioned towards the edge of the body, while the d-pad offers a rotational control to thumb between settings. Both of these dials are plastic which makes them stick out against the more premium metal body design, not that it affects use. Using the mode dial to switch between shooting modes - whether you want point-and-shoot simplicity or manual controls to make the most of things - is fairly stiff to rotate, but this works to the benefit of not knocking it out of place by accident.
On the rear of the camera is a 3-inch 921k-dot LCD screen for preview and playback which, thanks to its ample resolution, is a step above its predecessor. It seemed bright to view when testing in the UK, but it did struggle with presenting a visible preview in the Portuguese sun.
Unlike the Panasonic Lumix TZ60 there's no viewfinder in Canon's 30x zoom offering, and even though we weren't huge fans of the Panasonic finder, that would have made all the difference in such a sun-lit situation. It's not unusable in such conditions, just difficult to define a precise exposure and accurate framing.

More can mean less

The key reason to bag the SX700 HS is its significant zoom lens. It means wide-angle group shots or far-and-away subjects can be snapped to fill the frame. The toggle around the shutter button on top of the camera glides the lens through its zoom range at a reasonable pace and everything feels sturdy with nothing rattling around.

Despite a move to a 30x zoom across all the major manufacturers, it's a specification not without its limitations. Increase that zoom to maximum and it can be tricky for autofocus to latch on to a subject due to a slowing down of performance. It still has its uses, just don't expect super-fast infallible capture.
Part of the reason for this is the amount of light able to enter the camera in such a situation. The maximum available aperture at 750mm is just f/6.9, which means considerably less light is able to enter the camera than at the wide-angle setting and, as a result, the camera needs to boost settings to achieve a live image preview. In dim conditions this will likely mean a slowed frame rate on the screen and an increased shutter speed increasing the likelihood of a blurry shot. Even if you don't know the nuts and bolts of this background stuff, you'll feel it in use and it can frustrate.
The often excellent image stabilisation also finds its ceiling at this new significant focal length. Holding shots steady at the 750mm equivalent can be a little tricky, although we did find stabilisation to do a sterling job even when shooting at maximum zoom with less-than-desirable shutter speeds.

Performance

In general the SX700 is a capable performer, but the SX-line hasn't drastically evolved over numerous iterations and essentially leaves us wanting some more in certain areas.
Autofocus, for example, works really well throughout the wide-mid zoom range, but lacks the versatility of some of the competition. There's the choice for a single area focus point to be placed in the centre only, or automated Face AiAF will detect faces and subjects anywhere throughout the scene. That's it though: just the two options. Other competitors have touchscreens for placing the focus point, or pinpoint modes for heightened focus accuracy.
So while the Canon is as much a success as its SX280 HS predecessor, the world has kept on turning and Canon hasn't really evolved its offering as much as the jump from "280" to "700" might suggest.

Instead it has focused more on the increment in focal length rather than boosting the core performance to outpace the competition. Take that as you will: it means it's good overall, but helps highlight how much of a success the older model already was and still is.

Verdict

With a launch price of £329 the Canon PowerShot SX700 HS might not be a budget buy, but it cleverly undercuts the main competition from Panasonic and Sony by enough to make us stand up and pay attention. It not-so-cleverly also sits behind them by offering fewer features and a more simplistic operation, despite generally strong performance.
If you must have a massive zoom in a pocketable format then there’s a lot going for the SX700 HS. Thing is, we can’t help but think its SX280 HS predecessor, with its less significant zoom lens, was a more sensible all-round prospect. The SX700’s “30x zoom” badge may appeal, but the maximum zoom has its limitations andCanon has negated to boost its general features.
What the Canon achieves once again is quality images. They’re not quite perfect in every way, but the SX-line has always been top of its class in this regard. The SX700 HS is no different and it’s this that will make it one of the top travel zooms… even if the older SX280 HS might be twice as tempting based on its lower price point.

Canon 7D Mark II Review

on Tuesday, November 4, 2014
When the Canon 7D came out in 2009, it soon became one of the most popular DSLRs ever. It was fast, rugged, with great video features, all for a whole lot cheaper than the more pro-oriented 5D Mark II. Five years later, the 7D Mark II makes its debut with plenty of powerful specs, yet it's not likely to be the same wide-reaching hit as the original.
The 7D Mark II, which costs $1,800 for just the body or $2,149 with an 18-135mm kit lens, is a high performance camera. Its 20.2 megapixel APS-C size sensor is relatively humble in resolution, but the sheer computing power that drives it is staggering. It has many of the same guts as the uber-souped up $6,800 Canon 1DX. That's some impressive tech to squeeze into a device meant largely for advanced amateurs. This power is mainly used to drive the camera's two main selling points—autofocus performance and burst speed. It's tailor-made for shooting fast moving subjects like sporting events or wildlife. That's the niche Canon is chasing.

Please note that the unit we tested was a pre-production sample. After speaking with Canon, we are confident that the production units will be almost identical, but keep in mind that there could be tweaks in the version that is available for purchase.

Canon Lens EF 15 f2.8 Fish Eye Review

on Sunday, November 2, 2014
The Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens is currently one of Canon's two intentionally distorted EF lenses.
The heavy barrel distortion from the 15 Fisheye creates a special effect that is liked by most people (until it is over-used of course). With digital capture, we can now use fisheye-to-rectilinear conversion software to create a corrected picture equivalent to what a 12-13mm rectilinear lens would yield. This is great - but it takes some extra post-processing work and requires some knowledge of what the end-result will look like when capturing the shot.
PTLens is a really easy to use (Low $) rectilinear conversion software program (or Photoshop Plugin) based on Panorama Tools (included and free). Photoshop's lens correction tools can also rectilinear-convert the fisheye distortion. The downside to rectilinear conversion is that the image corners become soft. Reducing the image to 70% or less allows much of the corner sharpness to be recovered at the expense of the pixel size of the image.
Build quality of the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens is reasonable. The metal mount shows it is not a bottom of the line lens. The focus ring feels relatively low quality, but this lens does not cost a fortune either.

Along the same lines, the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens only has 5 aperture blades. This creates undesirable 5-pointed out-of-focus highlights. But, this lens is so wide that it is hard to get the background out of focus. So, this negative point is probably not important to most people either.
When I think of a highly distorted lens, I would expect the most distorted areas of the picture to be of lower quality. But that is not the case with the15 Fisheye. This lens has very nice image quality.
Close subjects tend to be soft at f/2.8 and become steadily sharper through f/8. Distant subjects were sharp wide open and improved little with the lens stopped down. What was most noticeable to me was the relativelyexcellent corner sharpness even on a full-frame body. The Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens easily bests the Canon EF 14mm L USM Lens, the Canon EF 16-35mm L USM Lens and the Canon EF 17-40mm L USM Lens for corner sharpness. At least until it is converted to rectilinear.
Vignetting is apparent at f/2.8, but less apparent than most of the alternatives. Vignetting disappeared quickly as the lens was stopped down.
Flare is moderately well controlled on the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens. For flare, it was much better than the Canon EF 14mm L USM Lens but not as good as the Canon EF 16-35mm L USM Lens.
In harsh/heavy contrast conditions (such as dark tree branches against a bright cloudy sky), CA (Chromatic Aberration) is a problem. It was generally not a problem in my real life shots, but very present under certain conditions.
Like the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens, the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens features a convex objective lens (yes - both the objective lens and the pictures it takes look like fish eyes) and a fixed metal petal type lens hood. Gelatin filters inserted into the rear of the lens are the only filters that can be used on this lens.
Standard screw-in protective UV filters can not be used on this lens. Nor can any other screw-in filters for that matter. A special lens cap is required to protect this lens and hood. Canon supplies a nicely manufactured metal cap that slips on over the hood. A fuzzy material on the inner sides of the cap protects the sides of the hood from scratching and gives it some adhesion to the lens. Unfortunately, it falls off far too easily. Canon has solved this problem on the 14mm L II.
Color and saturation both are fine.
Canon EF Ultra-Wide Angle Lens Perspective Comparison
The 15 Fisheye includes more in the picture than the other two f/2.8 ultra wide angle lenses Canon currently makes - the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens and the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Lens. These images were taken with a 1.3x FOVCF DSLR body. Here is a full frame (Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III) focal length comparison.
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens Focal Length Review
15mm Fisheye | 14mm | 17mm | 24mm
The Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens' angle of view is so wide that getting adequate flash coverage can be a problem. Expect to minimally need a flash with a built-in flip-down diffuser to cover the frame on a 1.3x or 1.6x FOVCF body. A Sto-Fen Omni-Bounce Diffuser will yield complete flash coverage on all bodies. Bouncing the flash may provide adequate coverage as well.
What is the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens used for? Nearly anything that requires an ultra wide angle lens. Similar to the rectilinear ultra wide angle lenses, the 15 Fisheye is useful for wide landscapes, wide day or night sky shots and Interior pictures of houses, vehicles and other confined spaces.
The fish-eye look is appealing as a special effect as well. It invites creativity. With an 8" minimum focusing distance, the 15 Fisheye can create some wild-looking effects. Remember to keep your feet out of the picture.
Architecture and real estate photography often have large subjects and require wide angle lenses - these are more good uses for the 15 Fisheye if distortion is acceptable - or removed.
I am impressed with the image quality from a lens this wide. If you don't mind the severe distortion or are willing to post-process the distortion out, the Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Lens will make a very nice wide angle lens for you.

Canon Lens EF 75-300 f4-5.6 USM III Review

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is a relatively small, very light and very cheap lens for this focal length range.
And the 75-300 III really is cheap. You usually get what you pay for - unfortunately this is the case with the 75-300 III.
Build quality of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is mediocre (and this may be a generous rating). Lightness is the benefit, but you won't find smooth zoom and focus rings. I wouldn't want to subject the 75-300 III to a lot of abuse as I doubt it would survive.
Image quality from the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is also mediocre.
The 75-300 III is soft wide open at all focal lengths. Sharpness decreases as it zooms from 70mm to 300mm. However, the corners are softest at 70 and getting better by 300.
Corner and center softness decrease as the 75-300 III is stopped down.
Stopping down a relatively slow lens means a lot of light (or a flash) is necessary for handheld photos. Handholding a slow lens at 300mm requires a lot of light to begin with.
A 7-blade aperture is a decent feature for a lens in this price range.

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is most comparable to the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens. Image quality is very similar between the two. Of course, IS can offset part of the handholding dilemma.
The 75-300 III suffers from CA (Chromatic Aberration). Pincushioning is visible at 300mm. Vignetting is well controlled. Focus speed is OK, but not fast.
The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is quite small and very light. It extends significantly when zooming to 300mm, but is very easy to carry around.
The 75-300mm focal length is very useful. A wide variety of uses can be found for this range including portraits/people, pets, nature ...
As for the price, I've already said - the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is cheap. This is one of the reasons you might consider this lens. If you can afford no more than this lens, you will be able to capture memories. You might also be interested in this lens if you intend to use it very infrequently.
Otherwise, I recommend getting one of the Canon EF 70-200mm L zooms such as the Canon EF 70-200 f/4 L Lens. The image and build quality of these lenses are much better. A 70-200 L lens with the Canon Extender 1.4x II resulted in better image quality than the 75-300 III alone.

If you care about great image quality and sharp photos, the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens is not for you. And Photoshop cannot enhance details that are not there.

I'll leave you with the word directly from Canon Marketing:
Compact and lightweight 4x telephoto zoom lens ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife. The newly developed Micro USM makes autofocusing quicker and quieter. The improved zoom mechanism also makes zooming smoother. The front part of the zoom ring now sports a silver ring for a luxury touch.


I love that part about the "silver ring for a luxury touch." :)
Bringing you this site is my full time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. I am grateful for your support!

Canon 5D Mark III Review

on Tuesday, October 28, 2014

This is an in-depth review of the new Canon 5D Mark III, a highly anticipated DSLR update to the Canon 5D Mark II that was released back in 2008. Built on the success of the 5D Mark II and featuring the most advanced autofocus system Canon has released to date from its EOS-1D X line, the Canon 5D Mark III is a rather promising upgrade to the 5D line. With an enhanced image sensor with ISO 100 to 25,600 native ISO range, fully weather-sealed camera body, 6 fps burst shooting speed and dual card support, the 5D Mark III seems to target all kinds of photography – from landscapes and fashion to sports and wildlife photography. In this review, I will not only provide detailed information about the camera, but will also compare it to the older Canon 5D Mark II, the Nikon D3s and the new Nikon D800.


I have been shooting with the Canon 5D Mark III for close to three months by now. I received it around the same time when I got a hold of the Nikon D800 and it has been a very interesting journey, shooting with both of these cameras side by side. As you may already know, I have been a Nikonian for a while now and most of the camera and lens reviews I have published to date cover Nikon products. Starting from earlier this year, I decided to expand my reach to Sony, Fujifilm and Canon cameras and lenses. While I personally prefer to stay focused on my brand of choice, some of the tests I perform compare performance across brands, so I decided that it would be best for me to get familiar with other camera systems as well. So far I have been enjoying this process and my overall impression at the moment is that all camera systems out there have their own advantages and disadvantages, just like I stated in my Nikon vs Canon vs Sony article, and no one camera system is superior than another. In short, no camera is perfect. I own a lot of Nikon gear and prefer shooting with it, because I started my journey into the world of digital photography with a Nikon DSLR. Had I started with a Canon or a Sony DSLR, my site would have been either Canon or Sony-centric instead.

Canon 6D Review

on Sunday, October 26, 2014
Although the Canon 6D has now been out for almost two years, I never had a chance to review it. Since the new Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art series lens was initially available only for the Canon mount, I requested the Canon 6D with the lens from our trusted partner B&H Photo Video. My aim was to review both, as I had been planning to review the 6D for a long time now. Ever since I reviewed the Canon 5D Mark III, our readers have been asking us to test out other Canon DSLRs, including the 6D. So this was a good opportunity to catch up, although quite late. Well, better late than never, I guess! Instead of covering everything in much detail though, I will be mostly summing things up based on my three month experience with the camera and feedback from others – I don’t think there is a need to spend a lot of time on this, especially after the camera has been in the market for so long and reviewed by so many people.
As you may already know, the Canon 6D came out at the same time Nikon released its budget full-frame Nikon D600 DSLR. So in many ways, both cameras were introduced to compete with one another. Because of this, I will be often referring to the D600 / D610 for comparisons, including image quality results. Keep in mind that a lot of what I say about the Canon 6D is obviously from the standpoint of a long time Nikon shooter.

1) Canon 6D Specifications
Main Features and Specifications:
  1. Sensor: 20.2 MP full frame CMOS sensor, 6.55µ pixel size
  2. Sensor Size: 35.8 x 23.9mm
  3. Resolution: 5472 x 3648
  4. Native ISO Sensitivity: 100-25,600
  5. Boost Low ISO Sensitivity: 50
  6. Boost High ISO Sensitivity: 51,200-102,400
  7. Sensor Cleaning System: Yes
  8. Image Processor: DIGIC 5+
  9. Autofocus System: 11-point AF with 1 cross-type sensor
  10. Lens mount: Canon EF
  11. Weather Sealing/Protection: Yes
  12. Body Build: Polycarbonate
  13. Shutter: Up to 1/4000 and 30 sec exposure
  14. Storage: 1x SD (SD/SDHC/SDXC compatible)
  15. Viewfinder Type: Pentaprism with 97% coverage
  16. Speed: 4.5 FPS
  17. Exposure Meter: 63-zone dual-layer iFCL metering sensor
  18. Built-in Flash: No
  19. LCD Screen: 3.2 inch diagonal with 1,040,000 dots
  20. Movie Modes: 1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps)
  21. Movie Output: AVI, H.264/MPEG-4 in MOV Format
  22. Built-in Microphone: Mono
  23. In-Camera HDR Capability: Yes
  24. GPS: Built-in
  25. Battery Type: LP-E6
  26. Battery Life: 980 (CIPA)
  27. USB Standard: 2.0
  28. Weight: 680g (excluding battery)
  29. Price: $2,099 MSRP on introduction, $1,899 MSRP current (as of 07/10/2014)
However, the Canon 6D has a few strengths worth pointing out that do matter to me personally, which I wish the Nikon D600 / D610 had. First, the Canon 6D has a built-in GPS. For a portrait photographer, this might be a useless feature, but for a landscape photographer, being able to get GPS information from each location where I shoot is very valuable. Unfortunately, GPS is Nikon’s weakness and I do not like the idea of mounting a GPS unit on the hot shoe, which has to be connected to the side of the camera! I have tried it once and will never do it again, hoping that we will someday see an integrated GPS module… Nikon finally introduced GPS in the Nikon D5300, but they again missed it out on the newly announced Nikon D810, so I am still waiting!
Another feature that can be quite useful when traveling is WiFi. Although it is cool to be able to control the camera remotely via WiFi, my primary interest is in being able to wirelessly transmit images from my camera to my phone to instantly share photos with my friends and family. The Nikon D600 / D610 do not have this feature and also require an external unit.
Lastly, the Canon 6D is pretty solid in terms of build and quality, while the Nikon D600 was a disaster, thanks to its sensor dust issue. After many months of failing to acknowledge the problem, Nikon silently released the Nikon D610 as an update, stating that the camera was introduced “in response to demand from a great number of users for a faster continuous shooting rate and the addition of a quiet continuous shutter-release mode” (see this article), which was a total lie. After many complaints and a number of lawsuits, Nikon was finally pressured to admit the fault and issued a D600 service advisory to take care of the problem. From this point, Canon 6D only had a single issue related to uploading of videos to YouTube, which Canon later fixed with a firmware update. This situation proved that we should look beyond pure specifications when evaluating our needs. What’s better, a camera with some limitations that works well, or a better featured camera that has ongoing dust problems? I pick the former and I am sure you would too, if you were one of those affected D600 users…

source: photographylife

Canon G7 X, Canon's first camera with a 1-inch sensor

on Thursday, October 9, 2014

This is where things get interesting! It's over two years since Sony shook up the compact camera market by putting a 1"-type sensor into a genuinely pocketable compact. The RX100 looked a lot like one of Canon's S-series of high-end compacts but used a sensor 2.8 times larger to offer a substantial increase in image quality.
Amazingly, Sony has remained unchallenged in this field for over two years, in which time it's managed to introduce two more generations of RX100. The RX100 III brought an electronic viewfinder and a more consistently bright (albeit shorter) zoom, helping it climb even further beyond the competition. That essentially unchallenged supremacy ends with the arrival of Canon's G7 X.

Like the RX100 III, the G7 X offers a 1"-type, 20MP BSI sensor mated to an F1.8-2.8 zoom starting at 24mm equivalent. The two cameras are also similar in size and offer broadly similar feature sets. Which is great for photographers, because it means the Sony finally has some proper competition.